http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/city ... posal.html
Best,
Matt
Frank wrote:This is precisely what they wanted all along. Do you really think they wanted(or thought the would get) balconies hanging over the sidewalks? It's standard developer bullshit. Ask for the world and then settle for what you wanted in the first place while the congregation pats each other on the back victoriously.
THE CITY JUST GAVE A BAR A STREET.
mattruben wrote:http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/cityhall/Nutter-vetoes-parking-surcharge-bill-parts-of-Finnigan-Wake-expansion-proposal.html
Best,
Matt
easy wrote:mattruben wrote:http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/cityhall/Nutter-vetoes-parking-surcharge-bill-parts-of-Finnigan-Wake-expansion-proposal.html
Best,
Matt
please tell me you will file a lawsuit or something?
mattruben wrote:the principle of Councilmanic prerogative. As folks may know, whenever a district Council member introduces a bill that impacts only his or her district, the other 16 members traditionally vote for it as a courtesy - and they expect the administration not to veto it, for the same reason.